A raging controversy has been going in the Roman Catholic Church since July 1988 when an international traditionalist Catholic organization, The Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) that was founded in 1970 by the French archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was excommunicated by Pope John Paul II from the Holy See when he refused to defer the ordination of four priests under the command of the papacy. This break with the Vatican also led the SSPX to push its limits with the Catholic Church and became in the Vatican’s eyes a schismatic organization. They declared that they followed traditional Catholic Canon Law that included the Tridentine Latin Mass, and refused to accept the changes of the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965).
The founder of the SSPX was a French prelate called Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who was prior the superior general of the Holy Ghost Fathers from 1962 to 1968. He retired in protest when the constitution of the Holy Ghost Fathers was rewritten adding revisions that Lefebvre considered to be the un-Catholic including the Modernist views of the Second Vatican Council. This then put Archbishop in direct opposition to the two supporting popes of Vatican II; John Paul II and Benedict XVI.
These tensions soon became actually schismatic when Archbishop Lefebvre and the four bishops he consecrated against the decree of the Vatican were officially excommunicated. Since that day, the “dialogue” continued when finally on January 2009, Pope Benedict XVI rescinded the “Church’s excommunication with the understanding that the entire membership of the society would speedily return to full communion with the Church.”
The implication of this action, in reference to the relationship between the Vatican and the Jewish rabbanim in Jerusalem is enormous for imbedded within the entire matrix of SSPX controversy is the fact that in all levels of the SSPX organization are priests that hate the Jewish people. This became a negative trend continued subliminally throughout the papal reigns of both John Paul II and Benedict XVI. As the Vatican was making efforts to move closer to the Jewish Mechoqeck, the leading rabbanim whom Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (Pope Benedict XVI) called “Fathers in faith”, they were also seeking to form a reunion with their own Catholic brethren who were
virulently opposed to the Vatican moving back historically to their true Torah Roots in the Hebrew-Judaic faith.
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, founder of the Society of Saint Pius X
This intense hatred against the Jews exposed itself as the “spirit of Amalek”, a genetic hatred against all of Hebrew blood. When Bishop Richard Williamson whose ordination caused the initial excommunication linked himself first with the Holocaust deniers when he was interviewed on Swedish television in 2009, he then continued to deny that there were any gas chambers that were used during the Holocaust as he spoke these words:
Bishop Richard Williamson – “I think that 200,000 to 300,000 Jews perished in Nazi concentration camps but that none of them via gas chambers.”
Bishop Richard Williamson is truly one of the more controversial SSPX members who has in the past prided himself with his anti-Semitic beliefs and denial of the Jewish holocaust in Europe. As the British born director of the SSPX seminary in La Reja, Argentina, he championed the anti-Semitic Russian forgery called The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, whose predominate thesis is that “The Jews” seek “world dominion” and that it was Jews who promoted the internal changes within the post-Vatican II Catholic Church.
After becoming a darling of the “conspiracy theorists” by inciting the charges that it was the United States who actually engineered the airline attacks upon the World Trade Center in New York on September 11, 2001, he continue to write “high profiled endorsements” of those Holocaust deniers, like the white supremacist and Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel, who was jailed in Canada and Germany for inciting racial hatred against the Jews.
Williamson also was linked as an associate of the well-known Holocaust denier David Irving who has spent his life and career trying to rehabilitate the image of Nazi Germany so much that he truly began to believe his own malignant suppositions that eventually led him to eventually deny the genocide of the Jewish peoples in Europe and also deny even the existence of the gas chambers in the Nazi concentration camps. These concepts have also permeated his ideologies of righteousness and evil that they have changed his perception of world reality. This reality erupted in full force one day, when he spoke in a church in Canada in 1989 declared that:
Bishop Richard Williamson – “There was not one Jew killed in the gas chambers. It was all lies, lies, lies. The Jews created the Holocaust so we would prostrate ourselves on our knees before them and approve of their new State of Israel."
Williamson later went on to express the dynamics of the relationship between the Roman Catholic Christian faith and the Orthodox rabbanim of Judaism when he against “raised his voice against the Jew” with these words:
Bishop Richard Williamson – “The Catholic faith and Jewish power are like two weighing pans on a pair of scales: when the Catholic Faith goes up, Jewish power goes down and vice versa.”
Such direct delineating statements suggest strongly that the absorption of the SSPX within the Vatican will fragment totally the recent bonds of friendship that have sought to heal the many mortal wounds between Judaism and the papacy in Rome under the pontiff rule of John Paul II and Benedict XVI. This also comes with the strong genealogical ties that Pope John Paul II was of Jewish bloodlines and the Pope Benedict XVI is a descendant of the famous Jewish rabbi called the Maharal of Prague.
In early February 2012, the Vatican represented by Cardinal William Levada, the prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (former infamous Roman Catholic Inquisition), the position held prior by Archbishop Joseph Ratzinger (Pope Benedict XVI), presented to Bishop Bernard Fellay, the superior general of the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) a written communiqué for the return to full communication within the Roman Catholic Church. The leading European rabbis urgently appealed to the Vatican to rescind and revoke this merger with the SSPX and suspend the talks of reunification. The efforts of the European rabbis came in vain.
Bishop Bernard Fellay, the Superior General of the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX)
Slowly but surely we are beginning to witness the final dramatic acts of the “Drama of the Ages” playing out the full spectrum of demonic evil and righteous goodness. As we witnessed the power of Christian Catholicism now merging with her daughters of Protestant Christianity with the recent reunification with the Anglican Church, so we are now witnessing the efforts of the Roman Catholic Church to bring all her daughters of infamy home, including the internal schismatic orders that rebelled against the supremacy of the Vatican. With this will include the Vatican now fully absorbing the virulent anti-Semitic and anti-Rabbanim organizations who despise and hate the “Jewish power” of the Judaism by stating that Bishops Richard Williamson’s invective words against Judaism is “a merely isolate case.”
This trend was depicted in the Op-Ed Expose by Arutz Sheva (Israel National News) that outlines the intense thread of anti-Semitic hatred against Judaism that is now permeating throughout the entire Catholic Brotherhood. It also exposed how their attitude against Judaism is being reabsorbed all the way to the top of the Vatican hierarchy. In it came also the revelation that the Italian branch of the SSPX nominated Father Pierpaolo Petrucci to become the new head of the SSPX with the retirement of Father Davide Pagliarani. An expose of Petrucci also suggests that his views on Judaism are a mirror image of Bishop Richard Williamson’s when he published an essay in the society’s website which stated:
Father Pier Paolo Petrucci, the New Director of the Italian Branch of the Society of Saint Pius X
Father Pierpaolo Petrucci – “About the Jews, Joseph Ratzinger calls them Fathers in faith. What does it mean? Supporting Israel’s policy despite the Palestinian question? Supporting the Jewish religion? If that’s the case, how can the Church approve a false religion which rejects Jesus Christ?"
The Anti-Semitic Hatred of Roman Christianity against “The Jews”
This picture of the Jews is so deeply imbedded in the mindset of the Vatican that it permeates all through Christendom, including Protestant Christianity. It is the source of the anti-Semitic pictures of the Jewish people as the killers of “The Christ” or the Christian messiah.
So today, even the Protestant Christians are totally clueless, that the Jewish peasants which constituted the main supporters of Hasidic Orthodox Jewish rabbi called Jesus the Nazarene, used also this same term “The Jews”. Instead of meaning the Jewish populous, it was a derogatory statement used by the Judean Jewish peasants for the oppressive dynastic Sadducee families that controlled the office of the High Priest serving in the Temple of Herod in Jerusalem.
Who then were people called “The Jews”? For almost seventy years, the High Priest hierarchy of the Dynastic family of Ananias the Elder along with the supporting Sadducees families that governing the religious life in the Roman Province of Judea plus the Pharisees of Beit Shammai who controlled the Jewish Synagogue services in Israel, all grew infamously wealthy. This was especially true of the Dynastic Family of the High Priest Ananias the Elder.
By using a corrupt money laundering scheme, the sacred animal were bought and sold over and over as the Jewish pilgrims came to buy doves and lambs for the sacrificial offerings. What could have been Temple of Herod, Inc. the High Priest’s family became the most family in the Roman world.
These facts was vividly portrayed in the curses of the “Jewish people or peasants” who railed against “The Jews” who were the controlling Jewish hierarchy of the house of Ananos (Ananias) they spoke these words; “What a plague is the family of Ananos; cursed be their hissing of vipers!
Today, we have many words that poignantly describe groups of infamy; “the Mob”, “the Family”, the Rothschilds”, “the Illuminati”, or “the Masons. These words of epithets represent slurs, words of infamy, abuse, or contempt of people who abuse or show contempt for the common man. Such was the derogatory phrase called; “The Jews”.
We see this so succinctly in the Gospel of John where it describes Rabbi Yahshua (Jesus) healing a man that was blind since birth sitting by the Pool of Siloam and no one could extinguish his joy of have his sight restored for the first time in his life. He was interrogated by the P’rushim (Pharisees of Beit Shammai) which opened up a dispute on the halakhic ruling of whether could be healed on the Shabbat. Since the Pharisee did not believe him, they went to interrogate the parents. Let us follow this dialogue:
John 9:18 – “But the Jews did not believe concerning him that he had been blind and received his sight, until they called the parents of him…
And they asked them, saying, ‘Is this your son, who you say was born blind? How then does he now see?” His parent answered them and said, ‘We know that this is our son, and that he was born blind; but by what means he now sees we do not know, or who opened his eyes we do not know. He is of age; ask him. He will speak for himself.
His parent said these things because they feared the Jews, for the Jews had agreed already that if anyone confessed that Yahshua was the messiah, he would be banned from the synagogue.”
Here were the Jewish peasants of the common class of people. They may have been upright and Orthodox Jews who followed every letter of the law. The context of this mini-drama centered upon an epithet that has been carried down to our modern era, two thousand years later.
This story highlights one concept, “The Jew” or “The Jews” were not the normal Jewish people but the rulers, the power brokers, the religious leaders, the globalist negotiators with the imperials of Rome. Yet, today, we blame the Jewish people for the sins of their appointed or self-appointed leaders who bartered the lives of their people with their global masters who truly ruled the Roman Province of Judea and became fabulously wealthy doing so. It was well known that Pontius Pilate the Roman governor of Judea was the highest paid governor in the entire Roman Empire, of which a large part came from “bribes” by the Sadducee families which effectively bought the office of the high priest.
The concept of “The Jews” representing the Sadducee factions of first century Jewish life, is played out today in the “The Jewish mafia in Russia”, the “Jewish Rothschilds” who control the United States Federal Reserve and are the leading power brokers trying to gain control of the world’s monetary system as the One World Order rises within our midst. “The Jews” had nothing to do with the Jewish people today as well as in the 1st century Jewish culture in Roman Judea as was portrayed in BibleSearchers Reflections 2007 article subtitled, “The Essenes’ Book of Enoch’s affect upon the Gift of Prophecy of the Hebrew Nazarenes”.
Biblesearchers Reflections – “The Jewish sages over the centuries have recognized that the period of the last forty years before the temple was destroyed was a period of progressive spiritual decline, moral depravity, and social anarchy. This included the controlling political and religious leadership in Jerusalem that were the few Sadducean families that bought the rights to be the high priest in the Temple of Herod from the governing Roman rulers. This practice made the office of the procurator of the Roman province of Judea the wealthiest of all the Roman governors in the Roman Empire. These were the movers and shakers of first century Jewish society.
These familieswere tightly married to one another and with the royal household of Herod, they kept the vast wealth of the Jewish province firmly within their own grip as they were partners in many Jewish business and enterprises that included the “Wall Street” of Jerusalem, the international banking and money exchequer system and the Bazaars of Hanan (House of Ananus) that bought and sold the sacrificial offerings to the visiting Jewish pilgrims visiting the temple of the Lord. They were so corrupt that they earned the “curses” of the Jewish peasants and “street people” with odes such as this.
Talmud, Pesachim 57 -
“What a plague is the family of Simon Boethus; cursed be their lances!
What a plague is the family of Ananos; cursed be their hissing of vipers!
What a plague is the family of Cantharus; cursed be their pens!
What a plague is the family of Ismael ben Phabi; cursed be their fists!
They are high priests themselves, their sons are treasurers,
Their sons-in-law are commanders, and their servants strike people with staves.”
Over the centuries, these Jewish proto-types of the modern Jewish internationalists have been held in distain by the Pharisee rabbis and sages when the School of Hillel returned to the control of religious education after the fall of Jerusalem. After that day, the Pharisees of the School of Shammai became byword of Jewish Torah culture."
“No Foreigner is to go beyond the Balustrade and the Plaza of the Temple Zone; whoever is caught doing so will have Himself to Blame for his Death which will follow” – Warning Signs written on the Barrier separating the Court of the Gentiles from the Jewish Courts.
It was the Sadducees, the conservative secularists, who did not believe in the resurrection or a “World to Come”. This rendered, in their minds, that the idea of a messiah, a future life, or the prophecies that spoke a literal, spiritual, and physical redemption, meaningless. Is it not reasonable that the modern secular Jews, as the political Neo-Cons in the Bush White House, the Jewish oligarchs and the Jewish mafia in Russia, the corporate Jews who control major stock and banking houses of Wall Street, and the owners of the American printing, newspapers, television, movie, and radio media are the spiritual descendants of the ancient Sadducees? We might suggest that the Judean society then was a microcosm of the economic world society today.
Yet the Pharisees were significantly divided. There were two main Jewish Torah seminaries; the disciples of the revered sage and nasi (president) of the Sanhedrin, Hillel the Great, from 30 BCE to 20 CE who formed the first rabbinic School of Hillel and the School of Shammai, the disciples of the austere anti-gentile Av Beit Din (vice-president) of the Sanhedrin (20 BCE to 20 CE), Shammai and later the president of the Sanhedrin for the next ten years till his death at 30 CE.”
These two schools did believe in the resurrection and the “world to come” yet disagreed over the belief of the disciples of Hillel that the “righteous gentiles” also had the privilege of participating in a future immortal life. Most prominently, the disciples of the School of Shammai wanted to erect barriers and isolate the Jews from the rest of the world.
In the days of Rabbi Jesus, the historical evidence has become much clearer about the great conflicts concerning Jewish halakhah between the two major rabbinic schools of education, Beit Hillel founded and governed by the famous Nasi, Rabbi Hillel the Great and his Bet Ab Din (Vice-President) Menahem the Essene and Beit Shammai, who opposed Beit Hillel in over 350 disputes concerning Jewish Torah Law.”
This conflict between the Dynastic House of the High Priest family of Ananias the Great was exposed in greater detail in the 1999 article in BibleSearchers Reflections subtitled, “Who were ‘The Jews’ who killed Jesus.”
The High Priest of Israel before the Ark of the Covenant at Yom Kippur
BibleSearchers Reflections – “For centuries there has been a vendetta of malice and hatred that has poured out upon the Jewish people because according to the history of the church that has been preserved by the Roman Orthodox Christian Church has stated, “The Jews killed Jesus.” This venom has permeated the Jewish-Christian relations for the last two thousand years.
This document has tracked the history of Ananus the Elder who was a young priest and later became the high priest and father to several high priests with Yahshua the Rabbi who became the moschiah (messiah) for possibly a majority of the people living in the province of Judea. The evolving picture of the House of Ananus and the family of Jesus leads to one conclusion; it was not the populous of the Jewish people who rejected the messiahship of Jesus. It was not the Jewish people who killed Jesus outside the walls of Jerusalem on 30 CE. It was the House of Ananus with Ananus the Elder the godfather of the clan, who were ‘The Jews’ that killed later the one called the “Jewish messiah”.
It was the priest Josephus who gives us a profile of Ananus son of Ananus and how the family of the House of Ananus operated in the vicinity of Jerusalem.
Josephus – “And now Caesar, upon hearing of the death and Festus, sent Albinus into Judea as procurator; but the king deprived Joseph of the high priesthood, and bestowed the succession to that dignity on the son of Ananus, who was also himself called Ananus.
Now the report goes, that this elder Ananus proved a most fortunate man; for he had five sons, who had all performed the office of a high priest to God, and he had himself enjoyed that dignity a long time formerly, which had never happened to any other of our high priests.” (Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, IX, 1)
To get a profile of the House of Ananus, let us look at Ananus the Younger and what type of person he was.
Josephus – “This younger Ananus, who as we have told you already, took the high priesthood, was a bold man in his temper, and very insolent; he was also of the sect of the Sadducees, who were very rigid in judging offenders, above all the rest of the Jews, as we have already observed; when therefore, Ananus was of this disposition, he thought he had now a proper opportunity (to exercise his authority).
Festus was now dead, and Albinus was but upon the road; so he assembled the Sanhedrim of the judges, and brought before them the brother of Jesus, who was called the Christ, whose name was James, and some others. (or some of his companions;) and when he had formed an accusation against them as breakers of the law, he delivered them to be stoned; but as for those who seemed the most equitable of the citizens, and such as were the most uneasy at the breach of the laws, they disliked what was done.” (Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, IX, 1)
This James the Just, the Nasi of the Sanhedrin of the Nazarenes left a legacy of righteousness upon the minds of the Jewish populations. Now three hundred years later, during the first official organizational structuring of what is today known as Christianity, the first historian called Eusebius wrote the history of the Nazarenes up to his day. Included in this history was a vignette of James the Tzaddik, the brother of the one whom Christians later called “The Christ”. As Eusebius wrote:
Eusebius - “Now Jacob the brother of the Lord, who, as there were many of this name, was termed the Just by all, from the days of our Lord until now, received the government of the Community with the apostles. This apostle was consecrated from his mother’s womb. He drank neither wine nor fermented liquors, and abstained from animal food. A razor never came upon his head; he never anointed himself with oil or used a public bath.
He alone was allowed to enter the Holy place. He never wore woolen, only linen garments. He was in the habit of entering the Temple alone, and was often to be found upon his knees and interceding for the forgiveness of the people; so that his knees became as hard as a camel’s…And indeed, on account of his exceeding great piety, he was called the Just (i.e. Tzaddik) and Oblias (i.e. Ophla-am), which signifies Justice and the People’s Bulwark; as the Prophets declare concerning Him.” (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, II.1)
We return to the first BibleSearchers Reflection quotation above and compare this picture of James the Just with the historical picture which Josephus describes Ananus the Younger:
BibleSearchers Reflections – "Here Josephus calls Ananus the Younger, “rash in his temper” and unusually daring. His religious theology was harsher or “more rigid” than any of the other Jews when they sat in judgment of offenders. He was an opportunity seeker trying to advance his own style of power, greed and authority.
He thought nothing to bend the law (the Roman law) to seek his own personal gain but there may have been something more sinister. It appears that Ananus the Younger was seeking revenge, revenge for the death of his brother, Jonathan by the dagger blades of the Sicarii.
He knew that the Sicarii were an ultra-right assassin group that hid under the broader label of Zealots, or those that were known to “zealous for the Torah (Law)”. The Zealots were a sub-party under a larger sect or Jewish party called the Nazarenes. The Nazarenes were named after “The One”, the messiah of a large part of the entire populous of the Jews in Judea, Jesus (Yahshua), the Nazarene.
There in the temple of the Lord was a priest who knelt in supplication day after day pleading to the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob for mercy for his people. The record of history states that he and possibly he alone served as the true ‘High Priest” of Israel and entered the Most Holy Place in the Temple of Herod. There he went to seek mercy for the Jewish people on the Day of Atonement.
Would it be hard to suggest that though the House of Ananus and all the priests that came from this family, from Ananus the Elder through five sons, one son-in-law and one grandson, that served as high priest in the temple did not dare to enter the Holy of Holiest and meet the God of their patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob face to face? Even though they were skilled at flaunting the Roman law, they knew they could not flaunt forever the God of Israel.”
The Sadducees in 1st century Judea represent Roman Christian anti-Semitism today
Here is the evidence of the history of 1st century Jewish life, and once again, it was not the Jewish populous of people who had any part of the death of the one whom most believed had become their messiah. Comprehending this fact also gives us insight as to the great power brokers who are trying to gain control of the whole earth and are using the “Jewish people” as their pawns, especially the Orthodox Observant Jews in Jerusalem and a majority of the Jewish population living within the Jewish settlements in Shomron and Judea.”
When Pope Paul II became the first pope to visit the Jewish Synagogue in Rome in 1986, it was the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) who distributed a placard with these words: “Pope, don’t go to Caiphas” recognizing as the New Testament plot of the Jewish high priestly family of Ananus the Great to execute Jesus. But how twisted this history has become!
These facts buttressed the infamous call of another SSPX priest, Don Mauro Tranquillo, who said that:
Priest Don Mauro Tranquillo - “The Jews are morally responsible for the deicide of Christ.”
Does this suggest that the Jewish people living today are responsible for the actions of Jewish rulers 2000 years ago? Let us apply this same question to us today; are you willing as a citizen of the United States to admit that you are responsible for the foreign policy decisions of Obama, the Bushes, the Clintons and most infamous anti-Semite President of the United States; Jimmy Carter in how we have created a hot-bed of hostility by our fabricated “war against terror” in Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Egypt and Libya in America’s bid to gain control of the oil reserves in the Middle East?
These words by Tranquillo also align up in support of the opinion of Petrucci who first in 2009 called the Jews rejecters of Christ. Yet a true analysis of the historical “Christ” differs from that which is revered by Petrucci and Tranquillo as Roman “Christians. The “Christ” in which they revere did not exist for there were not any “Christians” living in the Roman society culture during the reign of Nero. The historical Jesus again was a Jewish Rabbi who was of the lineage as a prince of the royal house of King David and Solomon and eligible to sit on the throne of David. As such, he was also eligible to be a Jewish messiah.
If we listen carefully to his arguments with the Pharisees who ruled the synagogues in Judea at the time of his rabbinic ministry, his halakhic arguments clearly opposed the arguments of the Pharisees representing the Rabbinic School of Beit Shammai. Yet, Rabbi Yahshua halakhic interpretations of the Torah Law represented more closely the Pharisees of the Rabbinic School of Hillel the Great in the numerous halakhic debates between Beit Hillel and Beit Shammai.
It was the early Roman Christians who first began to adapt the Jewish Rabbi called by them in the Greek language, Jesus Christ. They lifted him out of the matrix of the Hebrew Judaic culture where his life and philosophical culture was imbedded in the Torah given to them from the G-d of Israel upon the Mount called Sinai. Two centuries later, the Roman Christian Church then placed Yahshua HaMaschiah (Jesus the Messiah) within the matrix of the Greco-Roman Hellenistic culture imbedded with the multiculturalism of a multitude of other pagan cultures and reinvented a Jesus Christ.
Even so today, the Jesus of Roman Christianity is depicted as a babe that was carried in-utero to a peasant Jewish family in Nazareth and was born in Bethlehem. The Roman Catholic clerics have even doubted that he could speak Hebrew, and as having been born in a poor Jewish peasant family no doubt never had any rabbinic education within the notable Jewish yeshiva’s within Judea in the 1st century CE.
So we ponder again, does the Jesus of Roman Christianity have any reality to the historical Yahshua HaNotzri (Jesus the Nazarene) whom after his death upon a Roman cross became in the minds of millions of Gentiles around the world as Jesus of Nazareth.
Yet, if this same Jesus the Christ were transported back in time, two thousand years ago, would he and his life blend seamlessly into 1st century Temple of Herod cultural era? Or would the “Jesus Christ” as given to us by Roman Christianity, be recognized as a false messiah by Jesus the Rabbi, when he spoke these words in the Book of Matthew:
Matthew 7:21-23 - “Not everyone who says to me, ‘L-rd, L-rd!” will enter the Kingdom of Heaven, only those who do what my Father in heaven wants. On that Day, many will say to me, ‘L-rd, L-rd! Didn’t we prophesy in your name? Didn’t we expel demons in your name? Didn’t we perform many miracles in your name’ Then I will tell them to their faces, ‘I never knew you! Get away from me, you workers of lawlessness (rejection of the Written and the Oral Torah)!”
Strange as it may seem the very people in which the historical Jesus the Nazarene (Yahshua HaNotzri) spoke about two thousand years ago, may actually be believers who do say today, Lord, Lord, as they sit in Christian Churches and Basilicas around the world, whose denominations are the "daughters" in part of “The Church” widely known as the Roman Catholic Church.
Catholic apostasy has been predicated upon replacing the last remnant of Torah observing Jews with Roman Christians. This is why within “The Church” that appears to support “The Jews” are many who are totally against the Torah observing Observant Orthodox Jews building homes, schools, and communities in the biblical heartland of Israel where their forefathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob once lived in the regions of Shomron and Judea today.
Even the ancient Romans had great respect for the religious antiquity of the Jews. They gave them great respect politically in their early years for their primacy of keeping sacred the oracles of G-d and Rome even recognized their homes as living in regions of Judea, Samaria and in Galilee. Yet in the autumn of 2011, Regis de Cacqueray, the director of the French chapter of SSPX also accused Jews of deicide, when he made this remark:
Regis de Cacqueray – “How can one imagine that God is pleased with the prayers of the Jews, who are faithful to their fathers who crucified his son and deny the Trinitarian God?”
Not long after Bishop Richard Williamson’s explosive tirade denying that there were gas chambers in Auschwitz and Treblinka, Franz Schmidberger wrote a missive to the German bishops reminding them of what he called “The Jewish Original Sin”:
Franz Schmidberger – “With the crucifixion of Christ, the curtain of the temple was torn and the old alliance destroyed. The Jews are complicit in deicide, as long as they do not distance themselves from the culpability of their forefathers by acknowledging the divinity of Christ and the baptism.”
As the Ansa news agency has revealed, in 1997, the head of the Italian SSPX chapter, Ugo Carandino refused the request of the Holy See to forgive the Jewish people stating:
Ugo Carandino – “It’s the Jews which should ask our pardon for their usury.”
One of the bishops in which the Jewish descent Pope Benedict pardoned called Bishop Tissier de Mallerais also recounted:
Bishop Tissier de Mallerais – “The Jews are the most active artisans for the coming of Antichrist.”
What we are beholding is the remaking and the remodeling of the Vatican as Pope Benedict’s hand reaching out in unity with Lefebvre’s Society of Saint Pius X is a prelude to the return of the Roman Catholic Adversus Judeaos teachings which spurred which united Papal Europe into Jewish pogroms, Jewish heretics burnt at the stake in defense of their beliefs in G-d, and the infamous Roman Catholic Inquisition.
As Giulio Meotti pondered after writing about these revelations in the Jewish newspaper, Arutz Sheva (Israel National News), he wrote:
Giulio Meotti – “The Pope’s unity with Lefebvre’s group is a renovation of the Adversus Judeaos teachings which spurred pogroms, burnings at the stake and the inquisition. If the Vatican welcomes back these anti-Semites, the Jewish leaders should immediately stop any dialogue with the Catholic authorities.”
Have we turned full circle and now heading back into medieval European Roman Christian with pogroms, genocides, and more holocausts against the Jews. Will the Lost Ten Tribes of the House of Israel, completely imbedded within European and American Christian social cultural matrix be willing to rise up and support their tribal brothers, the Jews of the House of Israel?
Today, the Lost Ten Tribes of the House of Israel's descendants of the Northern Kingdom of Israel have a choice to make. It was their forefathers who first rebelled against the G-d of Israel, refused to worship in "House of HaShem" in the Temple of Solomon, or accept as their king, the kings from the royal lineage of Kings David and Solomon. Then they refused to accept the Mechoquek (rabbinic authority) of the House of Judah as their legal authority on the Torah Law. As a Lost Triber, will you be willing to stand up with your brothers, the Jews of the House of Judah today and also say, “Never again!, Never again!”
Credit to Giulio Meotti – “Op-Ed: EXPOSE: Jew Haters in the Vatican” – Israeli National News, March 1, 2012
************
You might want to Read the Following Destination Yisra’el Series –
The Legacy of Roman Christianity – “Two Millenniums of Hate Crimes against Jewish and Lost Israelites in Europe and the Middle East
The prophecies are clear that the G-d of Israel will fulfill what He has promised to fulfill so that peace can restored to all the earth. The theme of the final conflict between the descendants of Isaac, Esau (Edom/Rome) and Jacob (Jews and Lost Tribes of Israel) is one of the ascending prophesies to be completed at this time. In this series of articles, the days of pleasant homage to the Jews is over, and the virulent anti-Semitic persecution is about to erupt world-wide, not just to the Jews but all who seek to praise Israel and the Jews and seek to emulate themselves as wanna-be Jews, or wanna-be Israelites. They also will not be spared but will have to be counted as part of the brotherhood of the House of Jacob as though they were one with the Jews of Judah just as the Waldensians, the Huguenots, the Cathars, and the Albigenses were persecuted for allying themselves with the Jews over 300-700 years ago.
The role of prophetic understanding has now slipped away from Christian scholars as the Jews are now carrying the mantle of end-time prophetic understanding. One of the roles the Sages of Judah is to become the conduit for the Divine to give us hints as to HaShem's role in bringing forth the "Appointed Time" and the revealing of the Messiah. The great theme in all of this is the restoration of All Israel. This is not a conditional prophesy and neither is it a Jewish prophesy, but a Hebrew-Israelite prophesy. We will be restored back into brotherhood and fellowship with our cousins, the Jews of the House of Judah for that is G-d's will (Ezekiel 37). If you want to learn more, Contact “Kol Ha Tor Vision”, the Voice of the Turtledove.
Here is a joint Orthodox Jewish and 10-Triber Mission to bring awareness of the imminent fulfillment of the Biblical Prophecies regarding the Redemption of all Israel (12 Tribes Re-conciled and Re-United). This super Event of all Times will entail Establishing the Shomron (the Ancient Bible Heartland of the Patriarchs) and the Judean Wilderness as part of the Land of Israel, and preparing the “Land” for the Return of the Lost Tribes of the House of Israel and then the Redemption of All Israel. For inquiries about Kol Ha Tor Vision for the Lost Tribes of Israel, Visit – “Shomron Lives!”, a Spiritual Retreat and Guest House in Samaria, that is hosting a Shomron / Samaria 13-day Succot Tour in October 2011 to reacquaint the Returning Lost Tribers of the House of Israel.